Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mishra, Manju
- Impact of Smartphone on College Students
Abstract Views :510 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, H.R.P.G. College, Khalilabad, Santkabirnagar, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Psychology, H.R.P.G. College, Khalilabad, Santkabirnagar, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 7, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 310-313Abstract
The purpose of this study was to study of impact of Smartphone on college students. Smartphone have drastically changed the lifestyle of modern youth. The intention of this study is to understand all the positive and negative aspects of smart on the society. The study primarily focuses on impact of Smartphone on students. Participants in the study were 200 college students between the age 18-22 years. Questionnaire was used to study the use and impact of Smartphones on student's studies and social life. It was found that students use mostly Smartphones for social connectivity and educational purposes. It has some negative impacts too like wastage of time, information overload and neglect of physical activities.Keywords
Smartphones, Social Networking Sites, Mobile Applications, Information Overload.
References
- Barkhus, L., & Tashiro, J. (2010). Students socialization in the age of facebook Proceeding of the 28th International Conference on Human Factor in Computing System, ACM.
- Beniwal, M.K., & Sharma, A. (2013). Explosive growth of mobile technology and its potential impact on youth and education. Learning, 2, Issue 4.
- BBC New Technology (2015). Criminals target mobile devices and social networks. http://www.bbb.w.UK/news/technology
- Chun, K.T., Shao, L., Yu, Y., Lee, Z.L., & Urn, J. (2011). An investigation into the positive and negative health effects of usage of smartphones on raffles institution year 1 students.ijseas.com/volume2/v2i3/ijseas20160353.pdf
- Dyer, K. A., & Columbia, C. (2010). Challenges of maintaining academic integrity in an age of collaboration, sharing and social networking. Presentation to the Technology, Conferences, and Community Conference, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved November.
- Dwyer, C, Hiltz, S.R., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social network sites: A comparison of Facebook and Myspace. Proceedings of AMCIS.
- Hingorani, U.K., & Woodard, D. (2012). Exploring how smartphone supports students lives. Issues in Information Systems, 13(2), 33-46.
- Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world unite: The challenges and opportunity of social media. Business Horizon, 53(1), 59-68.
- Kibona, R.J.M. (2015). A review on the impact of smartphones on academics performance of students in higher learning institution in Tanzania. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2, Issue 4 ISSN 3159-00400.
- Sarvar, M., & Soomro, T.R. (2013). The impact of smartphone on society. European Journal of Scientific Research, 98(2), 216-226. ISSN 1450-2016/1450-202.
- Tayseer, F.Z., Alcheikhand, I., & Awadallah, M.N. (2014). Social network: Academic and social impact on college students. ASEE 2014, Zone 1 conference, April 3-5 (2014) University of Bridgeport, Brigepost (USA).
- Tayseer, R, Zoghieb, I., Alcheikhand, M.N., & Awadallah (2014). Social network: Academic and social impact on college students. ASEE, Zone 1 conference, April 3-5 (2014) University of Bridgeport, Brigepost (USA).
- Whitbourne, S.K. (2011). Your smartphone may be making you. Not Smart.
- A Comparative Study of Self-Esteem and Happiness of Hosteller and Non-Hosteller Boys and Girls Students
Abstract Views :761 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, H. R. PG College, Khalilabad, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Psychology, H. R. PG College, Khalilabad, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 7, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 442-445Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate self esteem happiness level of hosteller and non-hosteller of boys and girls. 120 students studying in undergraduate and post graduate classes were participated in the study. Half of them were hostellers and half of them were non-hostellers. Hostel life has many advantages and disadvantages for the students. Many students adjust themselves in hostel life and do well in their studies and remain happy. While some others hostellers find it difficult to live away from home and are constantly disturbed. They are unable to focus on study and remain unhappy too. This study mental health, happiness and self esteem of hostellers and non-hostellers boys and girls have been investigated. Self esteem is found to be correlated with happiness in earlier researches. Questionnaires were used to measure self esteem, and happiness level of participants. Result sows that self esteem had no significant impact on hosteller and non-hosteller. It was also non significant for gender too but hostellers was found better than non-hostellers. Hostellers were found to be happier that non-hostellers but girls students were more happy than boys in both samples whether they were hostellers or non-hostellers. Thus the effect of residence was not found significant in the study,only the effect of gender was found.Keywords
Self Esteem Happiness, Autonomy, and Environmental Mastery.References
- Argyle, M. (1987). The Psychology of Happiness. Methuen, London.
- Baker, L.A., Cesa, I.L., Gatz, M., & Mellins, C. (1992). Genetic and environmental influences on positive and negative affect: Support for a two-factor theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 158-163.
- Campbell,A.(1981). The Sense of Well-Being in America. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The Quality of American Life Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
- Campbell, J.D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538-549.
- Campbell, J.D., & Lavallee, L.F. (1993). Who am I? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-esteem. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed), Self-esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard (pp.3-20). Plenum Press, New York.
- Cantor, N., & Sanderson, C.A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman and E. Diener (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.434-450). New York: Russell.
- Diener & Schwarz, N. (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp.230-243.
- Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behaviour. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, RM. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behaviour. Plenum, New York.
- DeNeve, K.M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality Happiness and Self-Esteem 31 traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124,197-229.
- Diener,E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
- Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157.
- Diener, E. (1996). Personality and subjective well-being In D. Barone, M. Hersen, and V. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp.311-334). Plenum Press, New York.
- Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663.
- Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
- Diener, E., Larsen, R.J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R.A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48,1253-1265.
- Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119-139). International Series in Experimental Social Psychology Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
- Maslow,A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed). Harper, New York.
- Peplau, L.A., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (1982). Loneliness: A source book of current theory, research, and therapy. Wiley, New York.
- Reis, H.T (1984). Social interaction and well-being. In S. Duck (Ed), Personal relationships: Repairing personal relationships (pp. 21-45). Academic Press, London.
- Reis, H.T, Sheldon, K.M., Gable, S.L., Roscoe, R, & Ryan, RM. (2000). The role of autonomy competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22, 419-435.
- Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57,1069-1081.
- Ryff, C.D., & Keyes, C.L.M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
- Scheier, M.F, & Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Personality, 4, 219-247.
- Scheier, M.F., Carver, C.S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (& trait anxiety, self-mastery, & self-esteem): A revaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,1063-1078.